|
It is remarkable that the 10-page pre-convention
discussion
document “New Opportunities to
Grow the Party” does not mention that CPUSA
membership declined 60 percent since the last convention, falling from 2500 to 1000 members.
These estimates are
authoritative. The former is from Comrade Danny Rubin’s “Are We
Overlooking
Anything in the Fight to Build the Party?” (April 4, 2005) in which he cites a June 2004 report by Comrade Sam
Webb. The latter number was used by Comrade Bobbie Wood.
Even unbelievers know there are nuggets of wisdom in the
Bible. One of my favorites is:
“…Every
good tree bears good fruit, and a bad tree bears rotten fruit… By their fruits
you shall know them.” Matthew 7, 16-20.
Let’s look at the past decade of change in the CPUSA, and
its “fruits.”
The Tree: CPUSA Changes
since 2000
Ideological Mutation:
movement away from class struggle and Leninist norms of party organization
accelerates. This is always
denied, camouflaged, or called “reconfiguration.” The Party takes its political
lead from the Democrats generally and now from the Obama Administration. The
struggle for working class political independence is cast aside. Anti-racist
struggle is subtly weakened, despite economic indicators proving worsened
conditions for nationally oppressed. Anti-monopoly principles of health care
reform developed collectively over decades by Party specialists are scuttled in
one PW article.
Trailing behind the Democrats is rationalized by a
disingenuous Theory of Stages, which subtly moves the goal posts. Pre-2006,
unity against the ultra right aimed to maximize the forces against ultra right dominance of all three branches
of government. Now, the mere
existence of the ultra right is used to justify tailing the Democrats.
Tailism waters down anti-imperialism. The Pre-convention
Discussion Document on international affairs soft-pedals criticisms of the
present Administration whose foreign policy is little different from Bush’s,
and in some respects, is worse. Freeing the Cuban Five remains a low priority.
On Palestine, there is antipathy toward the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions
movement embraced by much of the world Communist movement. The national chair announces that “our”
view of socialism is “a work in progress.”
Transformation of
Political Strategy
Ideological change begets political change. Believing
anti-monopoly strategy to be too advanced for this ”stage” of struggle, the
main focus is instead on rebuffing the ultraright, invariably equated with the
GOP. Accordingly, the CP refrains
from criticizing its monopoly capitalist “allies,” unless they are Republican.
It exaggerates the differences within the ruling class. It plays down basic
Marxist concepts like the class character of the capitalist state.
Organizational
Changes
Key Leninist ideas such as the struggle for the leading role
of the Party are in practice abandoned. “As for us, we can provide
leadership only to the degree that we are in the trenches of building this
people’s upsurge” in all directions in the wider labor-led people’s movement.
This formulation implies we can lead only to the extent that we follow.
Clubs are revamped into Democratic Party support
organizations. Labor work is downgraded. Industrial concentration is a memory.
Whatever the AFL-CIO wants is okay with the CPUSA. Antiwar work has lower
priority. United for Peace and
Justice is weakened in no small measure due to CP abandonment of it. Democratic
centralism has weakened. The Organization Department was abolished. Clubs
drift. Individual members get no assignments, only self-assignment. The IT
panacea and “internet recruiting” have produced a situation where nobody can
verify the actual membership.
The “Fruits” of the
Change
1) Dwindling and aging membership. The 60 percent decline
means chronic Party financial
crisis, always addressed through cutbacks and shrinkage. Party’s physical
assets are sold off, or worse, even given away while reliance on rental
income grows.
2) Breathtaking mistakes in political estimates of the
present US Administration. Yet, the national chair boasts “our”
assessments have been largely “on the mark.”
3) Party invisibility. Dissolved in the Democratic Party
ocean, there is little public Party presence.
4) Dismantling.
Rebranded as “reconfiguring,” it is hailed as building for the future.
“For more than a decade, the Communist Party USA has been reconfiguring the way
we work and develop our analysis.” Reconfiguring shuts down one Party function after
another: print PWW, independent electoral work, left forms, mass meetings,
industrial concentration, bookstores,
press routes. Coming out of a meeting of the teachers union, I saw
newspapers being handed out by every Trotskyist sect, but no PW.
The 2005 Party convention gave no mandate to “reconfigure”
anything. The NB’s and NC’s responsibility is to carry out the convention’s
adopted policies, not invent their own. Our vision of socialism is not “a
work in progress.” Our vision of Socialism USA is democratically agreed at
convention and spelled out in our Party Program, not re-imagined at every
convention.
5) The withering of Party grassroots. All regions of the
country report dispirited clubs, declining activism and lackluster attendance.
Like the air slowly leaking out of a toy balloon, club life is running down.
6) Marxist-Leninist Party education is vanishing. PA a self-described “Journal of Marxist
Thought” is unusable for club education. Avoiding the word “Leninism” PA allows
the word “Stalinism,” a tell tale sign of incipient anti-Communism.
7) Labor work? Declare the AFL-CIO to be “left” and row in
behind it. Objectively, industrial workers have been downgraded. If your
ideology retreats from a class outlook, why care about the core of the class?
Failure -- without
Accountability for Failure
There is no excuse for Party membership decline. Interest in
socialism and Marxism is up since the September 2008 world financial crash. The
US class struggle is sharpening. The condition of US the working class, the
unemployed, communities of color, women, youth, and the poor is worsening
rapidly. There is no severe anti-Communist repression, as in the 1950s.
Conditions are superb for Party growth. The decline continues because the incorrect
general line continues, a political line which removes any reason for joining
the Party.
Instead, blame for
decline is adroitly shifted to the members: “But we’re still hampered by
ideas and ways of working ill fitted for the new times, which prevent us from
being more effective, moving forward and growing faster.” (“New Opportunities
to Grow the Party”)
Lack of accountability takes other forms. The Party Program adopted by the 2005
convention -- the highest authority in the Party -- is in great measure ignored.
It reads “the leading role of the Communist party is
expressed by its advanced Marxist-Leninist ideology.” The struggle for leading
role of party, though not formally abandoned in 2005, has been abandoned in practice. The telltale sign: the omnipresence of phrases that define
the Party as merely a servicing organization. It never leads. It “is a
participant in” coalitions, is “in support of” them, “lends a hand to” them,
etc. The word “Leninism” characterized as “foreign-sounding” is seen less and
less in CPUSA statements.
A 60 percent decline is the bitter “fruit” of changes since
2000. This convention must reject
attempts to shift the blame to members. We must hold leaders accountable for
the line that produced this disaster.
We must change the line.
April 14, 2010
http://www.cpusa.org/convention-discussion-by-their-fruits-you-shall-know-them/
|