The rulers would have you believe that the world is becoming more complex and dangerous all the time, compelling the United States to abandon previous (and largely fictional) norms of domestic and international legality in order to preserve civilization.
In truth, what they are desperately seeking to maintain is the global dominance of U.S. and European finance capital and the racist world order from which it sprang.
The contradictions of centuries have ripened, overwhelming the capacity of the ÂWestÂ to contain the new forces abroad in the world. Therefore, there must be endless, unconstrained war Â endless, in the sense that it is a last ditch battle to fend off the end of imperialism, and unconstrained, in that the imperialists recognize no legal or moral boundaries to their use of military force, their only remaining advantage. To mask these simple truths, the U.S. and its corporate propaganda services invent counter-realities, scenarios of impending doomsdays filled with super-villains and more armies of darkness than J.R.R. Tolkien could ever imagine.
Indeed, is left to the imagination, lest the peopleÂs minds wander into the realm of truth or stumble upon a realization of their own self-interest, which is quite different than the destinies of Wall Street or the Project for a New American Century (updated, Obama ÂhumanitarianÂ version).
It is a war of caricatures.
Saddam Âmust goÂ Â and so he went, along with a million other Iraqis. Gaddafi Âmust goÂ Â and he soon departed (ÂWe came, we saw, he died,Â quipped Hillary), along with tens of thousands of Black Libyans marked for extermination.
ÂAssad must goÂ Â but he hasnÂt left yet, requiring the U.S. and its allies to increase the arms flow to jihadist armies whose mottos translate roughly as Âthe western infidels must also goÂ next.Â AfghanistanÂs Soviet-aligned government was the first on the U.S. Âmust goÂ list to be toppled by the jihadist international network created as a joint venture of the Americans, Saudis and Pakistanis, in the early Eighties Â a network whose very existence now requires that Constitutional law Âmust goÂ in the American homeland.
Naturally, in order to facilitate all these exits of governments of sovereign states, international law, as we have known it Âmust go.Â In its place is substituted the doctrine of ÂhumanitarianÂ military intervention or ÂResponsibility to ProtectÂ (R2P), a rehash of the ÂWhite ManÂs BurdenÂ designed to nullify smaller powersÂ rights to national sovereignty at the whim of the superpower.
The entire continent of Africa has fallen under the R2P umbrella (without ever having fully emerged from the colonial sphere Â but, thatÂs the whole point, isnÂt it?). Somalia achieved a brief period of peace, in 2006, under a broadly based Islamic Courts regime that had defeated an array of warlords backed by the U.S.
Washington struck back late that year through its client state, Ethiopia. The Americans invoked both the Islamist enemy and ÂResponsibility to ProtectÂ to justify an invasion that plunged Somalia into what UN observers called Âthe worst humanitarian crisis in Africa Â worse than Darfur.Â Eventually, the U.S. enlisted the African Union, itself, as the nominal authority in a CIA-led Somalia mission that has militarized the whole Horn of Africa.
U.S. proxies set off inter-communal bloodletting in Rwanda in 1994, a conflagration that served as pretext for Rwandan and Ugandan invasion of the mineral-rich Democratic Republic of Congo and the loss of six million lives Â all under the protection, funding and guidance of a succession of U.S. administrations in mock atonement for the much smaller ÂgenocideÂ in Rwanda.
President Obama sent Special Forces on permanent duty to the region in search of another caricature, Joseph Kony, whose only central casting defect is his rabid Christianity but whose convenient presence in the bush justifies stationing Green Berets in Congo, Uganda, the Central African Republic and South Sudan.
Muammar GaddafiÂs exorcism in Libya energized jihadists all across the northern tier of Africa, as far as northern Nigeria, giving a green light to a French colonial renaissance and further expansion of AFRICOM, the U.S. Africa Command.
Only five years after its official inception, AFRICOM reigns supreme on the continent, with ties to the militaries of all but two African countries: the nemesis states Eritrea and Zimbabwe. (They Âmust go,Â eventually.)
New age Euro-American law holds sway over Africa in the form of the International Criminal Court. The CourtÂs dockets are reserved for Africans, whose supposed civilizational deficits monopolize the global judiciaryÂs resources. This, too, is R2P, in robes.
Back in Syria, the reluctant domino, blood samples taken from alleged victims of chemical weapons are sent to the Americans by jihadists in their employ to prove that Assad really, really, must go. Obama announces that he is going to do what he has actually been doing for a very long time: send weapons to the Ârebels.Â
The Washington Post, forgetting its duty to follow the administrationÂs scripted timelines, reports that the decision to go public about arms transfers to jihadists was made two weeks before the ÂproofÂ arrived.
The lies become jumbled and are quickly superseded by new fictions to justify no-fly, but the targeted caricatures remain front and center, to be hooted and hollered over, once dead.
It is only the lies that make these situations seem complex: the lies that cover up multiple U.S. genocides in Africa, to paint a canvas of humanitarian concern, when the simple truth is that the Americans and Europeans have established military dominion over the continent for their own greedy purposes.
The lies that have attempted to camouflage a succession of brazen aggressions against unoffending secular Arab governments in order to remove any obstacles to U.S. domination of North Africa and the Near East. And, the lie that has become central to the U.S. global offensive since 9/11: that the U.S. is engaged in a global war against armed jihadists.
In fact, the jihadists are American-contracted foot soldiers in an Arab world in which the U.S. is hated by the people at-large. Washington was the Godfather of international jihadism, its sugar daddy since at least the early Eighties in Afghanistan Â and now, once again quite openly so in Syria as in Libya, at least for the time being.
The simple truth is, the U.S. is at war for continued hegemony over the planet, for the preservation of the imperial system and its finance capitalist rulers. In such a war, everyone, everywhere is a potential enemy, including the home population.
ThatÂs why Bradley Manning and Julian Assange and, now, Edward Snowden are considered so dangerous; because they undermine popular consent for the governmentÂs lies-based policies.
The administration has sent its operatives to Capitol Hill and all the corporate pseudo-journalistic outlets to explain how its mega-data mining of phones and the Internet has prevented Âpotential terrorist events over 50 times since 9/11,Â including at least 10 Âhomeland-based threats,Â as mouthed by National Security Agency chief Gen. Keith Alexander. The details are, of course, secret.
However, what we do know about U.S. domestic ÂterrorÂ spying is enough to dismiss the whole premise for the NSAÂs vast algorithmic enterprises. The actual ÂterroristÂ threat on U.S. soil is clearly relatively slight. Otherwise, why would the FBI have to manufacture homegrown jihadists by staging elaborate stings of homeless Black men in Miami who couldnÂt put together bus fare to Chicago, much less bomb the Sears tower?
Why must they entice and entrap marginal people with no capacity for clandestine warfare, and no previous inclination, into schemes to bomb synagogues and shoot down military aircraft, as in Newburgh, New York? Why this steady stream of government-invented terror, if the real thing is so abundant?
If the FBI, with NSA assistance, is discovering significant numbers of real terrorists, wouldnÂt we be watching a corresponding number of triumphal perp-walks? Of course we would. The only logical conclusion is that terror is a near-negligible domestic threat, wholly unsuited to the NSAÂs full-spectrum spying on virtually every American.
So, what are they looking for? Patterns. Patterns of thought and behavior that ally reveal the existence of cohorts of people that might, as a group, or a living network, create problems for the State in the future. People who do not necessarily know each other, but whose patterns of life make them potentially problematic to the rulers, possibly in some future crisis, or some future manufactured crisis.
A propensity to dissent, for example. The size of these suspect cohorts, these pattern-based groups, can be as large or small as the defining criteria inputted by the programmer. So, what kind of Americans would the programmers be interested in?
Ask Edward Snowden. He’s the only one talking.
June 19, 2013