Developments at the recent African Union (AU) conference highlight the abject subservience to the West of the vast majority of states on the continent Â and African leaders’ occasional attempts to contest their subordinate status.
On an independent-minded note, the African Union rebuked the International Criminal Court for its fixation on indicting only Africans for crimes against humanity.
Ethiopia’s prime minister, who was also chairman of the AU meeting, said the court’s "process has degenerated into some kind of race hunting rather than the objective of taking care of crimes and impunities."
To drive home the point, the AU voted almost unanimously to ask the court to refer its case against Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta and his vice president back to Kenyan courts, saying Kenya had the capacity to adjudicate the matter on its own. Only Botswana objected to the proposal.
The ICC is known to eagerly indict just about anyone Â any African, that is Â who falls out of favor with the United States. The U.S. clearly favored Uhuru Kenyatta’s opponent in the presidential race, Raila Odinga Â which may have been one reason that Kenyans voted the other way.
Yet, the AU’s slap in the face of the court and, indirectly, its U.S. backers, is much less than it seems. Kenya remains an unwavering puppet of U.S. policy in the Horn of Africa, having joined in the invasion of neighboring Somalia at Washington’s behest. And Ethiopia and Uganda provide the bulk of the troops occupying Somalia under U.S. direction. On paper, the war in Somalia is an African Union and United Nations mission, but the war is run by the CIA and largely financed by the Europeans.
The African Union’s little rebellion against the International Criminal Court simply shows that African leaders understand that the Americans have no loyalties and are capable of turning on any one them when it suits their purposes, and having them tossed into prison by the International Criminal Court. The African heads of state were simply looking out for their own heads.
There was a lot of bluster in Addis Ababa about creating an independent African force to maintain order on the continent. The leaders voted to create an "intervening" military unit to rapidly deal with crises and coup d’etats. That would be followed by creation of a full-fledged African Standby Force Â a kind of continental standing army Â as early as 2015.
AU spokesmen speculated that the force "could be 100 percent" African, in terms of men on the ground. However, it would still need logistical support from the so-called "international community" Â a euphemism for the United States and Europe Â who are, of course, the sworn enemies of African independence.
The truth is, virtually all the armies of Africa, except for Eritrea, Zimbabwe and Sudan, have become integrated into either U.S. or French military structures, and cannot act independently.
African leaders claim they will try to break free by raising taxes on things like airline flights and hotel rooms Â but that’s nonsense for home consumption.
The African Union’s Peace and Security Commissioner, Ramtane Lamamra, spoke of the "historic nature and scope" of the AU’s tentative moves towards military independence.
But they are parakeets in a cage, trying to sound like eagles, fifty years after the formation of the Organization of African Unity.
June 4, 2013